Question: In the context of divine teachings, how do we reconcile instances in scriptures where Krishna appears to endorse violent actions, such as in the Mahabharata? Can these actions be viewed as necessary for the greater good, or do they challenge the notion of Krishna as a purely benevolent figure? What implications does this have for our understanding of morality in spiritual practice?
Answer by Romapada Swami:
The teaching of devotion is not anti-violence. For example, a medical doctor may engage in surgery or other invasive acts which may be perceived by others as violence.
Similarly, Krishna appeared in this world to check the demoniac forces – the duskritis – by whatever proper means. He did not espouse non-violence. Applying force when necessary is not only in Mahabharata but throughout Krishna’s past times. Persons who were inimical to the peaceful order as well as the sanctity of Vaisnavas were dealt with in appropriate manner. See SB 1.15.10 for example. Sometimes Krishna liberated them without violence, sometimes Krishna liberated them with violence. However, whenever violence was used those souls became liberated. That is the kindness of Krishna, not a transgression of dharma.
